2006منتدى Steadi-Newbies
مقارنة بين Steadicam وSK2 وFlyer للاستعمال مع Arri SR آلة تصوير
مضى على هذا 20 سنة. قد تكون المعدات والأسعار قد تغيّرت منذ ذلك الحين.
موضع خلافاختلف المشاركون ولم يصلوا إلى خلاصة. اقرأ النتائج على أنها مواقف، لا إجابة.
ما توصّل إليه النقاش
- The Flyer has a superior arm design compared to the SK2, offering better range and forgiveness in shot composition.
- The SK2 has a rated capacity of 20 pounds while the Flyer is rated for 15 pounds, creating a mismatch when the intended camera body alone weights 14-15 pounds with lens and accessories.
- إضافة نظم التركيز عن بعد وأجهزة إرسال الفيديو إلى أي من أجهزة الحفر يمكن أن يتجاوز بسرعة قدرة وزن Flyer، صنع ورشة عمل وإجراء اختبارات عملية ضرورية قبل الشراء.
- The Glidecam V25 offers a 25-pound capacity with performance comparable to the Flyer arm, includes more power and video ports on the sled, and provides better value for accommodating heavier cameras.
- The Arri SR1 features 12-volt power output that can supply the stabilizer rig directly, potentially reducing overall system weight.
- Operator physical capability matters significantly: wearing a stabilizer rig with camera payload requires testing your actual endurance before committing to purchase, as total supported weight (rig plus camera plus accessories) often exceeds rated camera capacity.
يعتمد على
- Discussion dates from 2006 and references older camera models.
- Weight specifications provided are stated specs rather than confirmed field measurements.
- Flyer manufacturer recommendation of the Flyer over SK2 despite lower capacity rating remains unexplained in the thread.
- Disagreement exists regarding whether back-mount or front-mount vest configurations cause physical strain, with different operators reporting opposite experiences.