2014منتدى General Discussion
تصوّر يدوياً عالياً على الرحلات الجوية الدولية ومخاطر الأشعة السينية للمطار
مضى على هذا 12 سنة. قد تكون المعدات والأسعار قد تغيّرت منذ ذلك الحين.
ما توصّل إليه النقاش
- High-ISO film such as 3200 stock carries greater risk of damage from airport X-ray machines compared to lower speeds
- Passengers in the United States have the legal right to request hand-inspection of film instead of X-ray scanning
- Outside the United States, airport security personnel may refuse hand-inspection requests and may not be obligated to comply
- Lead bags can reduce X-ray impact on film if hand-inspection is refused and the film must go through the machine
- X-ray damage to film can be detected by laboratories through unique radiation signatures left by specific machines
- Purchasing film at the destination and developing it before returning home eliminates transportation risks entirely
- Some airports mark film as safe up to 800 ISO, suggesting higher ratings carry unknown risk
يعتمد على
- Experience reported from 2014; current airport policies may differ
- The hand-checking right in the US applies to passengers but enforcement varies by airport and personnel
- One participant noted difficulty obtaining hand-inspection specifically at London Heathrow, though this was described as historical
- No definitive data provided on actual damage rates at specific ISO speeds or specific international airports
- Experience with lead bags shows mixed results with varying levels of protection