2005منتدى Steadi-Newbies
Comparing Archer and Clipper 2 steadicam rigs for video and 16mm work
مضى على هذا 21 سنة. قد تكون المعدات والأسعار قد تغيّرت منذ ذلك الحين.
ما توصّل إليه النقاش
- ويوفر الـ Clipper 2 قدرا أكبر من المرونة والوحدة في التشكيل بالمقارنة مع الـ Archer، وإن كان كلاهما يستخدمان نفس ذراع G50 و vest
- تكاليف الـ Archer أقل بنحو 000 10 دولار من Clipper 2
- الـ Archer لديها القدرة القصوى على تحميل الكاميرات بـ 23 رطلاً مع تمديدها بالكامل
- The Archer requires custom weight solutions to achieve dynamic balance with heavier batterypack like the Propac 14 or Hytron 120
- The Archer's monitor extends approximately 25 inches from the rear battery to the front of the monitor, which can restrict panning in tight spaces and complicate overhead shots like a don juan
- The Clipper 2 is described as a more robust and rugged sled design
- Both systems perform adequately within their design specifications
يعتمد على
- Experience based on specific camera configurations from 2005, including Sony XDCAM with focus control and wireless microphone equipment
- The Archer assessment involved custom modifications and workarounds rather than out-of-box performance
- Comparison limited to two steadicam manufacturers; other brands were not evaluated
- Opinions on relative robustness between the two rigs based on limited hands-on experience with the Archer