SteadiHub
2006منتدى Off Topic

الخصائص والقيود التشغيلية لدمية فيشر 11 مقارنة بالنماذج الأكبر

مضى على هذا 20 سنة. قد تكون المعدات والأسعار قد تغيّرت منذ ذلك الحين.

ما توصّل إليه النقاش

  • The Fisher 11 is smaller and lighter than the Fisher 10 but shares similar controls.
  • Widening the wheel track by turning wheels 180 degrees to extend approximately 5 inches on each side improves stability.
  • The lift beam is narrower than the Fisher 10 model, causing it to twist and bow more readily under load.
  • Long lenses combined with faster movements on dance floors can cause vibration issues.
  • The boom arm has limited feathering capability in the controls, making smooth motion more difficult.
  • Boom arm movements are easier to control when raising the camera from the floor than when lowering it, as weight distribution becomes challenging during descent.
  • Applying lubricant to wheel fixtures and track rails reduces creaking during operation.
  • The dolly is compact and fits well in confined spaces where larger models cannot be used.
  • Performance quality depends significantly on operator skill and practice.
  • A Chapman Super PeeWee IV was suggested as an alternative when production budget constraints prevent using a Fisher 10.

يعتمد على

  • The Fisher 10 is reportedly more stable and solid than the Fisher 11.
  • Instability may be more pronounced with heavy camera packages such as 35mm film cameras with large zoom lenses.
  • Experience was gathered on a shoot using a Sony 750 camera and HD format, which may differ from other camera systems.
  • One participant's assessment of boom quality was based on observation of a specific dolly grip's technique rather than direct personal use.
اقرأ النقاش الأصلياسأل عن هذا النقاشالإجابة تستشهد بالأرشيف