2007منتدى Follow Focus
انتقاء نطاقات الترددات اللاسلكية وإنتاج الطاقة لنظم التركيز اللاسلكية
مضى على هذا 19 سنة. قد تكون المعدات والأسعار قد تغيّرت منذ ذلك الحين.
موضع خلافاختلف المشاركون ولم يصلوا إلى خلاصة. اقرأ النتائج على أنها مواقف، لا إجابة.
ما توصّل إليه النقاش
- تشغيل Follow focus نظاما على نطاق الترددات المختلفة: 434 ميغاهيرتز، 900-928 ميغاهيرتز، و 2-4 GHz microwave, each with different range and interference characteristics.
- وتواجه فرق الترددات المنخفضة مثل 434 ميغاهيرتز تدخلا من أجهزة ذات قدرة عالية مثل مفاتيح السيارة، والاتصالات السلكية واللاسلكية الأمنية، والميكروفونات اللاسلكية، والمسامير الخفيفة، وأجهزة قراءة التذاكر التي تشغل طيف التردد 400-800 ميغاهيرتز.
- The 2.4 GHz Preston system operates at approximately 1 kilometer line-of-sight range but competes with WiFi transmitters and wireless camera control systems on the same frequency band.
- Higher frequency does not automatically provide longer range; range is inversely proportional to frequency, so 10 milliwatts at 2.5 GHz does not deliver ten times the range of 1 milliwatt at 900 MHz.
- FCC Part 15 compliance limits the BFD system to 1-2 milliwatts output, providing roughly 300 feet (100 meters) line-of-sight range and penetrating through multiple walls.
- Concert venues and large events create crowded RF environments with powerful transmitters that can jam wireless follow focus systems regardless of frequency band chosen.
- The 900 MHz band was historically abandoned due to overcrowding but later had less interference as users migrated to 2.4 GHz frequencies.
- The 2.4 GHz band experienced interference problems during a Paris shoot where multiple Preston systems and other 2.5 GHz devices created jamming issues.
يعتمد على
- Discussion is from 2007; current frequency allocations and device populations may differ significantly.
- No technical specifications provided for Bartech system output power, only frequency range mentioned.
- Claims about Preston system 1 km range are questioned by forum participants and not definitively confirmed.
- Specific interference problems described are anecdotal and tied to particular concert venues and event setups rather than systematic testing.
- Solutions proposed were not conclusively resolved in the thread.
المعدات في هذا النقاش
القطع
المعدات أو القطع نفسها
- 2026اسحب التركيز و اقسم نفسك أثناء العمل خاصة على العروض الحيةOperator practice
- 2026Swapping an ARRI ALEXA 35 between tripod/studio and Steadicam® mounting: baseplate choice and fastest work flow.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2025History of wireless focus and lens control systems for Steadicam®: from cable-based Cinema Products and Seitz to Preston digital, and European solutions by Chrosziel, cmotion, and ARRI.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2025LC-1 (Lens Control-1) follow focus system: wired structure, motors, and early operational experience (1990s).FacebookThe Steadicam Group