2010Forum Video Assist and Video Accessories
Vergleich von externen HD-Recordern: Nano-Flash gegen Panasonic AG-HMR10 für Videoaufnahmen am Set
16 Jahre alt. Geräte und Preise können sich seitdem geändert haben.
Was die Diskussion ergab
- Der Nano-Flash ermöglicht die Aufnahme mit höheren Bitraten als viele Kamera-interne Recorder und unterstützt mehrere Formatoptionen.
- Der Nano-Flash kann gleichzeitig mit Kamera-internen Recordern für Redundanz, alternative Formataufnahme oder gleichzeitige Zeitlupen- und Standardgeschwindigkeitsaufzeichnung verwendet werden.
- Allein für die Rollenerfassung kann der Nano-Flash seine Kosten im Vergleich zu billigeren Alternativen wie dem Panasonic AG-HMR10 nicht rechtfertigen.
- The Nano-Flash weighs less than one pound with a small footprint, making it suitable for mounting on stabilizing equipment with velcro and cables.
- The Nano-Flash lacks NTSC recording capability, limiting use on certain film and SD projects.
- The Nano-Flash has limited playback navigation with fast-forward jumping every four seconds and requiring videos to be watched through to the end for review.
- The Nano-Flash provides loop-through output with no delay and includes a microphone input for ambient sound or voice notes.
- The Panasonic AG-HMR10 uses AVCAM format and costs approximately 1500 dollars less than the Nano-Flash with promotional pricing.
- The AJA Ki Pro Mini was announced as an emerging alternative, priced under 2000 dollars with ProRes 422 recording and dual full-size XLR inputs, though larger and heavier than the Nano-Flash.
Hängt ab von
- The Panasonic AG-HMR10 is described as having no direct user experience reported in this thread.
- The AJA Ki Pro Mini information is based on announcement details only, with limited practical experience data.
- Pricing and availability were time-sensitive to 2010, making current relevance limited.
- The discussion does not provide detailed technical specifications or comparative testing results between devices.