2004Forum Center Post
Vergleich der Center-Post-Optionen für Steadicam-Rigs: PRO II 1,5-Zoll-Post im Vergleich zu XCS 2-Zoll-Carbonfaser-Post
22 Jahre alt. Geräte und Preise können sich seitdem geändert haben.
Was die Diskussion ergab
- Der XCS 2-Zoll-Carbonfaserpfosten bietet überlegene Steifigkeit mit minimalen Vibrationen, auch wenn er vollständig ausgefahren und mit langen Linsen verwendet wird
- PRO gimbal mechanisms feel notably smooth and slick compared to XCS gimbals which have a more dampened feel
- XCS posts feature bayonet-style locking mounts similar to PL camera mounts rather than tapered pin locks, allowing faster post changes and easier breakdown
- Carbon fiber posts maintain consistent diameter and cross-section shape throughout their length, whereas aluminum posts can develop warping or egg-shaped deformation after heavy use
- Compatibility between gimbal and post systems is an important consideration when building a rig, as mismatched components can create configuration challenges
- PRO posts from different manufacturing years may have slight tolerance variations in locking threads that can cause fit issues and stripped threads
- Purchasing posts simultaneously from the same manufacturer allows quality control checks on thread fit and tolerances before shipment
Hängt ab von
- Discussion is from 2004 and equipment specifications may have changed significantly since then
- User experiences are specific to individual configurations and working conditions
- The PRO MK-2 post mentioned was only in prototype stage at time of discussion
- No direct side-by-side technical specifications were provided comparing the exact posts in question
- Some users had not personally tested all comparison options they discussed