2010Forum Monitors
Cinedeck-Monitor und Aufzeichnungsgerät praktische Leistung und Einschränkungen im Feldeinsatz
16 Jahre alt. Geräte und Preise können sich seitdem geändert haben.
UmstrittenDie Beteiligten waren sich nicht einig. Lies die Befunde als Positionen, nicht als Antwort.
Was die Diskussion ergab
- Das Cinedeck funktioniert als kompakter Windows-PC mit integriertem Monitor und benutzerdefinierter Software zur Videoaufzeichnung.
- Die Helligkeitsbewertung des Cinedecks entspricht nicht der realen Tageslichtleistung; es funktioniert schlecht als Tageslicht-On-Set-Monitor im Vergleich zu dedizierten Feldmonitoren.
- Das Cinedeck zeichnet sich als Aufnahmegerät aus und eignet sich besonders gut für 3D-stereoskopische Arbeiten.
- Software stability issues include frequent freezing requiring up to ten minutes to restore live video feed, and shutdowns taking several minutes through the custom interface.
- Specific shutdown procedures are required; using Windows shutdown directly is significantly faster than exiting custom recording software first.
- Battery management is critical; allowing the battery to fully deplete causes severe software malfunctions.
- The device showed discrepancies between displayed recording settings and actual recorded output, requiring testing with post-production verification before deployment.
- The unit requires substantial RAM upgrades for adequate performance speed.
- The touchscreen interface lacks a lockout feature, creating accidental input risks during use.
- 3D mode operation can cause system instability requiring reboots.
- Thermal management issues have occurred during extended operation.
- Recording storage SSDs have experienced failures, though this has improved over time.
- No 4-pin XLR power input requires alternative power solutions when mounted on stabilization rigs.
- The device cannot change camera settings or frame rates during production without risking recording inaccuracies.
- Early adopter experiences were limited by minimal documentation provided with the unit.
Hängt ab von
- Experience reports are from 2010, representing early production units.
- Not all issues were fully documented; users did not exhaustively test all operational modes.
- Only 4:2:2 color sampling was tested; higher bandwidth formats like 4:4:4 or Alexa raw output behavior remains untested.
- Limited pre-production testing time available before deployment affected troubleshooting capability.
- Different users report varying performance results; some found it unsuitable for monitoring while others found specific use cases valuable.
- Daylight monitor performance remains poor; manufacturer indicated a daylight-optimized version was planned but not yet available.