2014Forum General Discussion
Comparaison des enregistreurs HD-SDI embarqués pour une utilisation de Steadicam
Il y a 12 ans. Le matériel et les prix ont peut-être changé depuis.
Ce que le fil a révélé
- L'enregistreur Nanoflash pèse environ neuf onces et tire environ six watts de puissance.
- Le Nanoflash peut être configuré pour passer à travers la vidéo HD-SDI sans introduire de retard.
- Nanoflash sortie vidéo au format 8-bit et prend en charge des débits de 50 Mbit jusqu'à 280 Mbit par seconde.
- Nanoflash stores recordings in QuickTime container format, enabling direct ingest without format conversion.
- The Nanoflash is considered more suitable for Steadicam work compared to the Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 due to its smaller size and weight.
- The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 consumes less power than the Nanoflash and offers bidirectional HDMI to SDI conversion.
- The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 records in ProRes format and stores files as QuickTime files.
- The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 can be mounted to a rig using dual lock fastener straps with a custom mounting plate.
- A power regulator should be placed inline when powering the Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 on a Steadicam.
- The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 outputs 10-bit video compared to the Nanoflash's 8-bit output.
Dépend de
- The comparison is anecdotal and based on individual user experiences.
- No technical specifications are provided for the Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 regarding weight, power draw, or exact recording formats beyond ProRes mention.
- Specific use cases and requirements that make one recorder preferable to the other are not systematically evaluated.