2005Forum Steadi-Newbies
Comparaison de Archer et Clipper 2 steadicam pour le travail vidéo et 16mm
Il y a 21 ans. Le matériel et les prix ont peut-être changé depuis.
Ce que le fil a révélé
- Le Clipper 2 offre une plus grande flexibilité de configuration et de modularité que le Archer, bien que les deux utilisent le même bras G50 et gilet
- La Archer coûte environ 10 000 $ de moins que la Clipper 2
- La Archer a une capacité maximale de charge utile de la caméra de 23 livres avec le poste entièrement étendu
- The Archer requires custom weight solutions to achieve dynamic balance with heavier battery packs like the Propac 14 or Hytron 120
- The Archer's monitor extends approximately 25 inches from the rear battery to the front of the monitor, which can restrict panning in tight spaces and complicate overhead shots like a don juan
- The Clipper 2 is described as a more robust and rugged sled design
- Both systems perform adequately within their design specifications
Dépend de
- Experience based on specific camera configurations from 2005, including Sony XDCAM with focus control and wireless microphone equipment
- The Archer assessment involved custom modifications and workarounds rather than out-of-box performance
- Comparison limited to two steadicam manufacturers; other brands were not evaluated
- Opinions on relative robustness between the two rigs based on limited hands-on experience with the Archer