2013Forum Off Topic
Choisir entre USB 3.0 et Thunderbolt RAID stockage pour l'édition vidéo sur un MacBook Pro
Il y a 13 ans. Le matériel et les prix ont peut-être changé depuis.
Ce que le fil a révélé
- USB 3.0 RAID arrays offer more total storage capacity but may introduce speed bottlenecks during video editing compared to Thunderbolt solutions.
- Thunderbolt RAID enclosures provide faster performance but at higher cost and with lower total capacity when comparing similar price points.
- For video editing workflows, isolating scratch disk operations to a separate internal SSD drive reduces bottlenecks compared to relying solely on external storage.
- Removing the optical drive from a MacBook Pro and installing a second internal SSD as a scratch disk is a straightforward process that improves editing performance.
- RAID 5 configuration with parity provides both speed and redundancy for primary storage, while archival backups should be copied offline to separate external drives to minimize ongoing fault risk.
- G-Technology Thunderbolt drives have shown reliable performance in mobile and frequent plug/unplug scenarios based on extended field use.
- Western Digital Red drives offer good price-to-performance ratio, though the enclosures may feel less robust than premium alternatives.
- Daisy-chaining multiple Thunderbolt RAID units allows for future capacity expansion without replacing the entire array.
Dépend de
- Recommendations are based on 2013 hardware and USB 3.0 specifications; higher-speed USB standards were anticipated but not yet released.
- The discussion assumes specific use case of occasional video editing rather than professional production workflow.
- Drobo systems received negative reliability reports in this thread but lack detailed technical analysis of failure modes.
- Lacie products were dismissed without specific technical reasoning.
- Predictions about future USB 3.0 speed improvements (10Gbps parity with Thunderbolt by 2014) were not verified.