SteadiHub
2011Forum Video Assist and Video Accessories

Comparaison des enregistreurs HD portables et des solutions de surveillance, y compris Sidekick, Atomos Samurai, HyperDeck Shuttle, Nanoflash, Sound Devices Pix240 et Cinedeck

Il y a 15 ans. Le matériel et les prix ont peut-être changé depuis.

ControverséLes participants n’étaient pas d’accord et n’ont pas abouti à une conclusion. Lis les résultats comme des positions, pas comme une réponse.

Ce que le fil a révélé

  • Sidekick offre un écran de 4,3 pouces avec une résolution 480x272 pixels, ce qui peut être insuffisant en tant que moniteur de sauvegarde mais est adapté pour l'enregistrement.
  • Sidekick comprend un montage 1/4-20, une taille compacte, une conception légère à 12 onces avec SSD, des commandes faciles, une surveillance de la confiance et une conversion croisée entre les sorties HDMI et SDI qui restent actives indépendamment de la source d'entrée.
  • Sidekick records in ProRes format only, which requires Mac-based workflows and creates compatibility issues for users preferring other codecs or non-Apple systems.
  • Atomos Samurai offers similar functionality at $1495 without the 128GB SSD but requires choosing between HDMI-only or SDI-only models rather than supporting both simultaneously.
  • Sound Devices Pix240 records in both ProRes and DNxHD codecs, includes professional audio preamps, and features a 5-inch high-resolution screen, expected to launch in September.
  • HyperDeck Shuttle costs $345 and records uncompressed video with cross-conversion capability between HDMI and HD-SDI, though it lacks a monitoring screen.
  • Cinedeck is the only recorder known to support user-installable codecs of choice but costs between $10,000-$12,000.
  • Nanoflash supports XDCam-formatted files and 10-bit recording but lacks an integrated monitor.
  • Sidekick may introduce processing delay of 5 or more frames, which could affect confidence monitoring.
  • SSDs used in recorders require reformatting after each download cycle to avoid fragmentation issues.
  • HyperDeck Shuttle requires only basic mounting with velcro and does not demand extensive custom cabling or complex setup.

Dépend de

  • Discussion occurred in 2011 before many of these products received extensive field testing.
  • Sound Devices Pix240 had not been field tested at time of discussion, with September release planned.
  • HyperDeck Shuttle was characterized as new with limited real-world usage reports.
  • Specifications for Sidekick screen resolution and potential processing delay were stated without confirmation from actual users.
  • Cinedeck pricing information may be outdated.
  • Some participants disagreed about HyperDeck Shuttle setup complexity and SSD performance requirements.
Lire le fil originalPoser une question sur ce filLa réponse cite les archives