2010Forum Monitors
Cinedeck moniteur et dispositif d'enregistrement performances pratiques et limitations en utilisation sur le terrain
Il y a 16 ans. Le matériel et les prix ont peut-être changé depuis.
ControverséLes participants n’étaient pas d’accord et n’ont pas abouti à une conclusion. Lis les résultats comme des positions, pas comme une réponse.
Ce que le fil a révélé
- Le Cinedeck fonctionne comme un PC Windows compact avec moniteur intégré et logiciel personnalisé pour l'enregistrement vidéo.
- L'indice de luminosité de la Cinedeck ne correspond pas aux performances de la lumière du jour dans le monde réel; il fonctionne mal comme un moniteur de lumière du jour sur le plateau par rapport aux moniteurs de terrain dédiés.
- Le Cinedeck excelle en tant qu'appareil d'enregistrement et fonctionne particulièrement bien pour le travail stéréoscopique 3D.
- Software stability issues include frequent freezing requiring up to ten minutes to restore live video feed, and shutdowns taking several minutes through the custom interface.
- Specific shutdown procedures are required; using Windows shutdown directly is significantly faster than exiting custom recording software first.
- Battery management is critical; allowing the battery to fully deplete causes severe software malfunctions.
- The device showed discrepancies between displayed recording settings and actual recorded output, requiring testing with post-production verification before deployment.
- The unit requires substantial RAM upgrades for adequate performance speed.
- The touchscreen interface lacks a lockout feature, creating accidental input risks during use.
- 3D mode operation can cause system instability requiring reboots.
- Thermal management issues have occurred during extended operation.
- Recording storage SSDs have experienced failures, though this has improved over time.
- No 4-pin XLR power input requires alternative power solutions when mounted on stabilization rigs.
- The device cannot change camera settings or frame rates during production without risking recording inaccuracies.
- Early adopter experiences were limited by minimal documentation provided with the unit.
Dépend de
- Experience reports are from 2010, representing early production units.
- Not all issues were fully documented; users did not exhaustively test all operational modes.
- Only 4:2:2 color sampling was tested; higher bandwidth formats like 4:4:4 or Alexa raw output behavior remains untested.
- Limited pre-production testing time available before deployment affected troubleshooting capability.
- Different users report varying performance results; some found it unsuitable for monitoring while others found specific use cases valuable.
- Daylight monitor performance remains poor; manufacturer indicated a daylight-optimized version was planned but not yet available.