Running performance with back-mounted steadicam vests compared to front-mounted designs

Gear

ZephyrCan I fly my Alexa or RED on a Zephyr?389

Master SeriesIs a used Master Series rig worth buying as a first big rig?191

BFDHow do I power my BFD receiver from my camera or sled?186

VoltCan I retrofit a Volt onto my existing sled or gimbal?168

ArtemisHow do I power my camera and accessories from an Artemis sled?166

MDRWhere can I mount my Preston MDR on my rig?143

ModulusIs there a Modulus option for HD wireless video?141

G-70Will my G-70 fit my vest, gimbal or sled?126

FI+ZCan I control iris and zoom wirelessly, not just focus?60

HU3Where can I get my HU3 repaired, refurbished or repainted?60

CineLiveHow do I pack and case my CineLive rig for transport?54

G-70XHow does the G-70X compare to Pro Titan, Xarm and other arms?46

Trinity 2Is Trinity 2 SUP 3.0 firmware safe to install or buggy?46

Ultra VestWhich vest should I choose for my body size, comfort and operator type?39

2005Vests forum

21 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

Running with a back-mounted vest is possible, though initial acceleration may require more effort than with front-mounted vests due to different weight distribution across the body
Front-mounted vests assist forward running by naturally pulling the operator forward, while back-mounted vests shift weight distribution toward the heels and toes, requiring different body mechanics
Back-mounted vests provide better overall balance during running once up to speed despite the slower initial acceleration phase
Back-mounted vests may offer smoother weight distribution for walking shots compared to front-mounted designs

Claims based on limited personal testing by individual operators in 2005
No systematic comparison data provided
Individual body mechanics vary, so acceleration differences may differ between operators
Specific vest models and arm compatibility issues mentioned but not fully detailed