2013General Discussion forum
Selection and comparison of thin versus standard BNC cables for video equipment
13 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.
What the thread found
- Thin BNC cables are advantageous when routing cables across gimbal systems due to their reduced bulk.
- Standard BNC cables are more durable and cost significantly less than thin alternatives, with regular cables costing around six dollars for two to four foot lengths.
- Not all thin BNC cables provide adequate shielding, which can result in signal interference when wireless communication devices operate nearby.
- Custom-made thin BNC cables from specialized makers tend to be well-constructed and reasonably priced compared to mass-produced options.
- Standard BNC cables can perform adequately for gimbal routing without requiring the expense of thin alternatives.
- Thin BNC cables experience higher rates of connector damage and disconnection compared to standard cables.
Depends on
- Weight savings from thin cables are minimal and may not justify the cost difference.
- Some users report that standard cables work adequately for gimbal crossing, suggesting thin cables may not be necessary for all applications.
- Discussion involves subjective preferences and individual experiences rather than systematic testing.
- No specifications provided for the thin cables discussed.