SteadiHub
2004Operating forum

Weight considerations and camera selection for handheld running rig configurations

22 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

What the thread found

  • A fully equipped running rig built around the Arri 435 typically weighs 21-22 kilograms without arm and harness, which limits handheld use to very short shots due to fatigue.
  • The Arri 435 requires three batteries for power, whereas lighter camera alternatives could operate on two batteries, significantly reducing overall rig weight.
  • Lighter camera models like the Arri 235 or SL-Cine can serve as alternatives for running rigs when high frame rate capability is not a requirement.
  • High-speed shooting at 100 fps or above restricts practical camera choices to models like the Arri 435, which often necessitates running rig configurations despite increased weight.
  • The Arri 3 offers a less optimal video assist system, particularly for night shooting scenarios, which can make it problematic for certain productions despite its lighter weight.
  • Power distribution to separate batteries through harness or assistant placement can help manage weight distribution for high-speed camera operation requiring multiple battery packs.

Depends on

  • Discussion centers on specific Arri camera models and their availability in rental houses at the time of posting.
  • High frame rate requirements (100+ fps) substantially narrow equipment choices and override weight optimization preferences.
  • The practical feasibility of splitting battery loads between operator and assistant depends on production circumstances and crew availability.
  • Video assist quality varies between models and affects usability for night shooting situations.
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive