IDX CW-1 wireless video transmitter and receiver system specifications and field performance

Gear

ZephyrCan I fly my Alexa or RED on a Zephyr?389

Master SeriesIs a used Master Series rig worth buying as a first big rig?191

BFDHow do I power my BFD receiver from my camera or sled?186

VoltCan I retrofit a Volt onto my existing sled or gimbal?168

ArtemisHow do I power my camera and accessories from an Artemis sled?166

MDRWhere can I mount my Preston MDR on my rig?143

ModulusIs there a Modulus option for HD wireless video?141

G-70Will my G-70 fit my vest, gimbal or sled?126

FI+ZCan I control iris and zoom wirelessly, not just focus?60

HU3Where can I get my HU3 repaired, refurbished or repainted?60

CineLiveHow do I pack and case my CineLive rig for transport?54

G-70XHow does the G-70X compare to Pro Titan, Xarm and other arms?46

Trinity 2Is Trinity 2 SUP 3.0 firmware safe to install or buggy?46

Ultra VestWhich vest should I choose for my body size, comfort and operator type?39

2012Video Assist and Video Accessories forum

14 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

The IDX CW-1 operates on 5GHz frequency with HDMI input and output, supports multiple video formats including 1080p and 720p at various frame rates, and has less than 1ms frame delay.
The system can transmit video up to 328 feet according to specifications, though real-world testing showed signal loss occurring around 350 feet in an outdoor environment.
The transmitter consumes 3.5W maximum power via Mini USB and weighs 0.7 ounces, with an optional battery addition rated for 11 hours of operation.
Multiple wireless video products including the CW-1, Paralinx, and others use the same underlying Amimon chipset but may differ in firmware, software, power delivery, and antenna designs.
Products based on Amimon technology vary in their implementation approach: some manufacturers use off-the-shelf modules while others integrate custom video boards and antennas with the wireless chipset.

The 2012 launch date and pricing information is historical.
Real-world range testing was limited to indoor venue conditions initially, with outdoor testing showing signal degradation.
The comparison to Teradek Bolt and Paralinx was based on preliminary observations rather than comprehensive side-by-side testing.
No internal electronic specifications or detailed software analysis was provided.