SteadiHub
2014General Discussion forum

Comparison of onboard HD-SDI recorders for Steadicam use

12 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

What the thread found

  • The Nanoflash recorder weighs approximately nine ounces and draws about six watts of power.
  • The Nanoflash can be configured to pass through HD-SDI video without introducing delay.
  • Nanoflash outputs video in 8-bit format and supports bitrates from 50 Mbit up to 280 Mbit per second.
  • Nanoflash stores recordings in QuickTime container format, enabling direct ingest without format conversion.
  • The Nanoflash is considered more suitable for Steadicam work compared to the Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 due to its smaller size and weight.
  • The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 consumes less power than the Nanoflash and offers bidirectional HDMI to SDI conversion.
  • The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 records in ProRes format and stores files as QuickTime files.
  • The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 can be mounted to a rig using dual lock fastener straps with a custom mounting plate.
  • A power regulator should be placed inline when powering the Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 on a Steadicam.
  • The Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 outputs 10-bit video compared to the Nanoflash's 8-bit output.

Depends on

  • The comparison is anecdotal and based on individual user experiences.
  • No technical specifications are provided for the Hyperdeck Shuttle 2 regarding weight, power draw, or exact recording formats beyond ProRes mention.
  • Specific use cases and requirements that make one recorder preferable to the other are not systematically evaluated.
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive