2005Steadi-Newbies forum
Comparing Archer and Clipper 2 steadicam rigs for video and 16mm work
21 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- The Clipper 2 offers greater configuration flexibility and modularity compared to the Archer, though both use the same G50 arm and vest
- The Archer costs approximately $10,000 less than the Clipper 2
- The Archer has a maximum camera payload capacity of 23 pounds with the post fully extended
- The Archer requires custom weight solutions to achieve dynamic balance with heavier battery packs like the Propac 14 or Hytron 120
- The Archer's monitor extends approximately 25 inches from the rear battery to the front of the monitor, which can restrict panning in tight spaces and complicate overhead shots like a don juan
- The Clipper 2 is described as a more robust and rugged sled design
- Both systems perform adequately within their design specifications
Depends on
- Experience based on specific camera configurations from 2005, including Sony XDCAM with focus control and wireless microphone equipment
- The Archer assessment involved custom modifications and workarounds rather than out-of-box performance
- Comparison limited to two steadicam manufacturers; other brands were not evaluated
- Opinions on relative robustness between the two rigs based on limited hands-on experience with the Archer