SteadiHub
2004Video Assist and Video Accessories forum

Building and sourcing eyepiece taps for video assist on film cameras

22 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

What the thread found

  • Eyepiece taps can be constructed from a 24mm C-mount lens paired with an extender to achieve the required macro focus distance of approximately 1 inch from the front element.
  • The CCD sensor array must be positioned away from the lens using the extender to reach the proper focus distance for eyepiece tap operation.
  • A machined gear is necessary to interface with the eyepiece mount thread, which varies between camera models such as double helix on older Arri models and triple helix on newer ones.
  • Alternative DIY mounting can use aluminum strips attached to the lens secured with hose clamps to the eyepiece assembly after removing the eyecup optics.
  • Pre-made tap systems like those from PCI or JAR manufacturers are commercially available but designed for specific sensor sizes like 2/3 inch cameras.
  • Optical adapters can be sourced through scientific supply catalogs like Edmund to convert between different CCD sensor sizes on existing tap systems.
  • Rental houses may supply stainless steel flanges from various camera models that can be adapted for eyepiece tap construction, though this approach remains expensive.
  • Used eyepiece tap systems appear on secondary markets with significant cost savings compared to new equipment.
  • Building a functional eyepiece tap requires investment in optics, metalworking tools, and precision alignment, with success not guaranteed.

Depends on

  • This discussion is from 2004 and reflects equipment and pricing of that era.
  • The DIY construction method described requires significant metalworking and optical expertise.
  • Compatibility varies by camera model and CCD sensor size, requiring case-by-case adaptation.
  • No consensus reached on whether DIY construction represents genuine cost savings versus commercial options.
  • Specific pricing and product availability mentioned are historical and likely outdated.
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive