SteadiHub
2007Monitors forum

Transvideo Cinemonitor HD6 specifications and performance evaluation from NAB 2007

19 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

What the thread found

  • The Cinemonitor HD6 features a 16x9 aspect ratio with a 4x3 display area that includes space below the image for menu text, waveform monitor display, and integrated bubble level.
  • The monitor provides 450 nits of brightness across three configurations: full bright for outdoor use, calibrated for indoor or tent use, and user configurable settings.
  • Two SDI inputs accept either HD or SD signals with one output, though composite video input was not initially available but was being considered by the manufacturer.
  • Frameline options include three user-defined sets in various colors and patterns with the ability to mask areas outside framelines using black or semi-transparent overlays.
  • Technical limitations in achieving both HD resolution and high brightness simultaneously resulted in the lower brightness rating compared to earlier Cinemonitor models.
  • The monitor was positioned as both a portable production monitor and color reference tool with calibration capabilities.
  • Frameline customization and integrated bubble level were identified as particularly useful features for production work.
  • Approximate retail pricing was stated as $6500 with additional $700 costs for each optional feature like framelines and bubble level.
  • Direct sunlight performance remained a potential concern given the 450 nits brightness compared to 900 nits on predecessor models.
  • Marshall V-R70P-HDSDI 7 inch LCD monitor was tested by users as an alternative option but received poor reviews for daylight performance and overall image quality compared to Transvideo products.

Depends on

  • Information based on NAB 2007 demonstration units with final versions not expected until June 2007.
  • Only three demonstration units were reportedly in the country at the time of the NAB report.
  • Brightness specification and outdoor performance claims remained untested in real-world field conditions.
  • Composite video input capability was missing from initial specifications but was under consideration.
  • Price information was explicitly marked as approximate and subject to change.
  • Comparison based on limited demonstration experience rather than extended field use.
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive