2008Cameras (Film/Video/HD) forum
Steadicam operator experience with Panavision G2 conversion kit suitability and rental house communication issues
18 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.
What the thread found
- The Panavision G2 with conversion kit presents significant operational challenges for steadicam work that may make it unsuitable for extended handheld camera operation.
- Rental house sales representatives may contradict operator expertise regarding camera suitability, potentially undermining the operator's professional judgment on set.
- When equipment disputes arise during production, payment deductions may be applied even when the operator declines to use equipment deemed operationally problematic.
- Steadicam operators working with digital cinema cameras should specify single-piece or two-piece configuration modes to avoid operational conflicts.
- Direct communication with rental house representatives about equipment concerns is preferable to resolving disputes through third-party accounts.
Depends on
- The account relies on hearsay about what a sales representative allegedly said, passed through multiple people rather than direct conversation.
- The specific technical reasons for refusing the G2 reference external forum discussions not included in this thread.
- No resolution was achieved in the original situation, leaving producer and operator with conflicting understandings of responsibility.
- Other operators report differing experiences with the same equipment and rental house, suggesting context-dependent outcomes.