2012Monitors forum
Teletest Cyclops HD monitor performance and suitability for Steadicam work
14 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.
What the thread found
- The Cyclops HD achieves approximately 1500 nits brightness and remains visible in direct sunlight even when positioned against the sun direction.
- Brightness of the Cyclops HD is significantly higher than standard monitors that came with rigs, providing practical improvement for outdoor operation.
- The monitor exhibits poor color accuracy with visible color shift, excessive contrast that cannot be adequately adjusted, and reduced sharpness compared to other professional monitors in its class.
- Picture quality issues on the Cyclops HD make it unsuitable for critical tasks like exposure metering or white balance reference, though it remains adequate for focus confirmation.
- The HD-SDI input version produced no perceptible quality improvement over composite input on this particular monitor model.
- Viewing angles are better when looking down at the monitor from above than from below, which suits typical Steadicam operator positioning.
- The monitor lacks standard 8-pin lemo connectors for video, power, and tally, requiring custom breakout solutions.
- For budget-conscious operators needing maximum brightness without critical color work, the Cyclops HD provides practical value despite picture quality limitations.
- The HD designation refers to input signal compatibility rather than actual panel resolution, which remains standard definition.
Depends on
- Experience limited to composite and HD-SDI inputs on one unit by the reporting operator.
- Brightness assessment made under specific weather conditions in one geographic location.
- No laboratory measurements of actual brightness or color accuracy provided; assessment based on subjective visual comparison.
- Focus testing limited to AF101 camera in unspecified shooting conditions.
- Comparison photographs taken with iPhone 4 without controlled lighting or professional measurement.
- No extended field use data available beyond initial testing period.
- Alternative monitor options mentioned were not tested under identical conditions.