Shipping cases and methods for Steadicam vests and arms

Gear

ZephyrCan I fly my Alexa or RED on a Zephyr?389

Master SeriesIs a used Master Series rig worth buying as a first big rig?191

BFDHow do I power my BFD receiver from my camera or sled?186

VoltCan I retrofit a Volt onto my existing sled or gimbal?168

ArtemisHow do I power my camera and accessories from an Artemis sled?166

MDRWhere can I mount my Preston MDR on my rig?143

ModulusIs there a Modulus option for HD wireless video?141

G-70Will my G-70 fit my vest, gimbal or sled?126

FI+ZCan I control iris and zoom wirelessly, not just focus?60

HU3Where can I get my HU3 repaired, refurbished or repainted?60

CineLiveHow do I pack and case my CineLive rig for transport?54

G-70XHow does the G-70X compare to Pro Titan, Xarm and other arms?46

Trinity 2Is Trinity 2 SUP 3.0 firmware safe to install or buggy?46

Ultra VestWhich vest should I choose for my body size, comfort and operator type?39

2011Cases/Carts/Stands and Transport forum

15 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

A Pelican 1650 case can accommodate a vest with the front door and carbon arm removed, while a Pelican 1600 case works for the arm and springs separately.
A Pelican 1640 case is large enough to hold a Klassen vest in its leather bag while keeping the low-profile arm attached, though the case itself is heavy and has large external dimensions.
The manufacturer-supplied Klassen leather bag has proven durable for shipping via checked airline baggage over many years and numerous flights without damage to the equipment inside.
A Rubbermaid Action Packer, priced around $25, can accommodate a vest and its bag as a budget-friendly shipping option.
The manufacturer states that shipping in the provided bag is acceptable.

The Pelican 1640 may not be the optimal choice and other case options likely exist.
The fit of an arm in a Pelican 1640 alongside a Klassen vest was uncertain at the time of the discussion.
One user mentioned concerns about airtight cases for shipping purposes, indicating potential regulatory or practical issues not fully explained in the thread.
The discussion is from 2011, and case availability and recommendations may have changed.