2006Off Topic forum
Operational characteristics and limitations of the Fisher 11 dolly compared to larger models
20 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- The Fisher 11 is smaller and lighter than the Fisher 10 but shares similar controls.
- Widening the wheel track by turning wheels 180 degrees to extend approximately 5 inches on each side improves stability.
- The lift beam is narrower than the Fisher 10 model, causing it to twist and bow more readily under load.
- Long lenses combined with faster movements on dance floors can cause vibration issues.
- The boom arm has limited feathering capability in the controls, making smooth motion more difficult.
- Boom arm movements are easier to control when raising the camera from the floor than when lowering it, as weight distribution becomes challenging during descent.
- Applying lubricant to wheel fixtures and track rails reduces creaking during operation.
- The dolly is compact and fits well in confined spaces where larger models cannot be used.
- Performance quality depends significantly on operator skill and practice.
- A Chapman Super PeeWee IV was suggested as an alternative when production budget constraints prevent using a Fisher 10.
Depends on
- The Fisher 10 is reportedly more stable and solid than the Fisher 11.
- Instability may be more pronounced with heavy camera packages such as 35mm film cameras with large zoom lenses.
- Experience was gathered on a shoot using a Sony 750 camera and HD format, which may differ from other camera systems.
- One participant's assessment of boom quality was based on observation of a specific dolly grip's technique rather than direct personal use.