2012Video Assist and Video Accessories forum
Business practices for charging separately for HD wireless video transmitters from steadicam packages
14 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- Separating HD transmitter rentals from steadicam kit allows clients to select only the equipment they need based on production type and budget constraints.
- Production managers often prefer itemized quotes that clearly identify each piece of equipment and its cost rather than bundled pricing.
- Equipment like focus control systems and wireless transmitters should be charged as separate line items rather than included in the base kit rental, as they represent significant capital investments by operators.
- Quoting via email rather than phone allows production managers to make more informed decisions about equipment needs without focusing solely on price reduction.
- Understanding the specific production requirements and camera setup before quoting helps justify which equipment is necessary and which can be optional or rented separately.
- HD transmitter capability like wireless video allows focus pullers to see image detail for critical focus work, adding value beyond simple video village monitoring.
Depends on
- The discussion reflects primarily North American and UK freelance steadicam operator perspectives from 2012 when HD transmission was still relatively new technology.
- Whether separate charging is feasible depends on local market conditions and competitive pressures in different regions.
- The appropriateness of charging separately varies significantly by production genre, with different rates and expectations for commercials versus live television versus features.