2013Video Assist and Video Accessories forum
Comparison of Taradek Bolt and Paralinx Arrow wireless video transmitters for on-set video monitoring
13 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- Both the Bolt and Arrow use similar chipsets and offer comparable range and signal quality
- The Bolt features HD-SDI connectivity and built-in battery with regulator, while the Arrow uses HDMI and requires USB power
- The Arrow uses a modular design approach allowing future feature additions, whereas the Bolt does not offer this modularity
- The Bolt requires line-of-sight operation and may not reconnect immediately after signal dropout
- The Arrow is better suited for cameras with unused HDMI ports like the Red Epic, avoiding the need to chain multiple components on a single SDI connection
- The Arrow can output to either SDI for large client monitors or HDMI for handheld battery-powered director monitors
- Renaming an Arrow unit with more than 9 characters can cause a stack overflow and crash the receiver
- Both devices have been reported to perform reliably in production situations when used correctly
Depends on
- Discussion is from 2013, technology may have been updated since then
- One user reported powering problems with the Bolt but did not provide details
- The comparison is based on user experiences rather than comprehensive technical testing
- Future modular additions to the Arrow mentioned were announced but implementation status is unclear
- Recommendation depends heavily on specific camera and workflow setup