SteadiHub
2013Video Assist and Video Accessories forum

Comparison of Taradek Bolt and Paralinx Arrow wireless video transmitters for on-set video monitoring

13 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

What the thread found

  • Both the Bolt and Arrow use similar chipsets and offer comparable range and signal quality
  • The Bolt features HD-SDI connectivity and built-in battery with regulator, while the Arrow uses HDMI and requires USB power
  • The Arrow uses a modular design approach allowing future feature additions, whereas the Bolt does not offer this modularity
  • The Bolt requires line-of-sight operation and may not reconnect immediately after signal dropout
  • The Arrow is better suited for cameras with unused HDMI ports like the Red Epic, avoiding the need to chain multiple components on a single SDI connection
  • The Arrow can output to either SDI for large client monitors or HDMI for handheld battery-powered director monitors
  • Renaming an Arrow unit with more than 9 characters can cause a stack overflow and crash the receiver
  • Both devices have been reported to perform reliably in production situations when used correctly

Depends on

  • Discussion is from 2013, technology may have been updated since then
  • One user reported powering problems with the Bolt but did not provide details
  • The comparison is based on user experiences rather than comprehensive technical testing
  • Future modular additions to the Arrow mentioned were announced but implementation status is unclear
  • Recommendation depends heavily on specific camera and workflow setup
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive