Teradek Bolt Sidekick lightweight receiver for wireless video transmission

Gear

ZephyrCan I fly my Alexa or RED on a Zephyr?389

Master SeriesIs a used Master Series rig worth buying as a first big rig?191

BFDHow do I power my BFD receiver from my camera or sled?186

VoltCan I retrofit a Volt onto my existing sled or gimbal?168

ArtemisHow do I power my camera and accessories from an Artemis sled?166

MDRWhere can I mount my Preston MDR on my rig?143

ModulusIs there a Modulus option for HD wireless video?141

G-70Will my G-70 fit my vest, gimbal or sled?126

FI+ZCan I control iris and zoom wirelessly, not just focus?60

HU3Where can I get my HU3 repaired, refurbished or repainted?60

CineLiveHow do I pack and case my CineLive rig for transport?54

G-70XHow does the G-70X compare to Pro Titan, Xarm and other arms?46

Trinity 2Is Trinity 2 SUP 3.0 firmware safe to install or buggy?46

Ultra VestWhich vest should I choose for my body size, comfort and operator type?39

2015Video Assist and Video Accessories forum

The Bolt Sidekick is a compact wireless receiver designed to pair with second-generation Bolt Pro transmitters (300/600/2000 models) for director's monitor applications.
The receiver offers 300 feet line-of-sight transmission range and comes in SDI or HDMI versions.
The device weighs 9 ounces, features a fanless design, accepts 7-17V input power via 2-pin Lemo connector, and includes 1/4-inch 20 female mounting.
AB/V plate adapters are available to mount the receiver while allowing passthrough power to external monitors.
Users can power the receiver from Sony L-series batteries with barrel outputs by tapping into a 2-pin Lemo connection.
Field pairing capability is supported between transmitter and receiver.

This is an announcement post with limited technical field testing discussed.
Pricing was still to be determined at the time of posting.
The specific performance characteristics under various environmental conditions are not detailed in this thread.
One user noted concerns about velcro mounting reliability on small hardware and requested hard-mount options, suggesting the standard mounting approach may have limitations.