2010General Discussion forum
Payment issues with production companies and strategies for operators to secure compensation
16 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- Production companies sometimes fail to pay operators for work performed, even after extended periods and signed contracts.
- Requesting payment on the day work is performed is more reliable than waiting for invoiced payment terms.
- Payment collection through credit card processors or deposit systems reduces the risk of non-payment from unfamiliar clients.
- Filing wage claims with local labor enforcement agencies can pressure production companies to settle before receiving permits for future shoots.
- Operators may retain copyright to footage they have created if payment is not received, which can provide leverage if the material is used commercially.
- Production companies should be evaluated by operators using similar verification processes that companies use to evaluate operators, such as requesting references and proof of payment history.
- Small claims court is an available option for pursuing unpaid invoices.
- Rental houses and equipment providers use qualifying procedures like advance payment via credit card and insurance certificates that individual operators could adopt.
- A centralized registry or reference system where operators share information about companies with payment problems would help the industry.
- Government entities and established organizations are not immune to non-payment issues.
Depends on
- Copyright retention as leverage only works if the material is sold or used commercially.
- The effectiveness of labor board intervention depends on the jurisdiction and whether the company is issuing permits in that location.
- Small claims court procedures and monetary limits vary by jurisdiction.
- The legal ability to retain copyright ownership varies by state law.
- Some claims about payment outcomes are anecdotal rather than systematic data.