2009General Discussion forum
Rental house refusal to provide clip-on matteboxes with certain lenses and potential damage concerns
17 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.
What the thread found
- A rental house may refuse to rent clip-on matteboxes alongside certain premium lens sets, citing concerns about equipment damage.
- The weight of a clip-on mattebox with filters mounted on older lens barrels can warp focus forks, which are expensive to replace.
- Zeiss has stated that weight on the front of older lens models like Superspeeds can cause damage, though this is less of a concern with newer lens designs like Ultras or Masters.
- Tightening a clip-on too much can squeeze the lens barrel and increase friction on focus threads, causing premature wear.
- When a rental house declines to provide ordered equipment, failing to communicate this in advance forces customers to make last-minute alternative arrangements.
- Other rental houses routinely provide clip-on matteboxes with the same lens models without reported issues, suggesting the risk may be manageable with proper technique.
- A clip-on mattebox should be checked for focus resistance both before and after mounting to detect problems.
- Universal clip-on matteboxes exist but may require different diameter step-down rings for various lens sets.
Depends on
- The damage claim is specific to older Zeiss Superspeeds; newer lens models reportedly have stronger internal components.
- The extent of the damage risk depends on proper installation technique and how tightly the clip-on is secured.
- Industry practices vary widely between rental houses.
- The discussion occurred in 2009 and may not reflect current lens designs or standards.
- One rental house's experience with damaged lenses cannot be independently verified.