Cinedeck monitor and recording device practical performance and limitations in field use

Gear

ZephyrCan I fly my Alexa or RED on a Zephyr?389

Master SeriesIs a used Master Series rig worth buying as a first big rig?191

BFDHow do I power my BFD receiver from my camera or sled?186

VoltCan I retrofit a Volt onto my existing sled or gimbal?168

ArtemisHow do I power my camera and accessories from an Artemis sled?166

MDRWhere can I mount my Preston MDR on my rig?143

ModulusIs there a Modulus option for HD wireless video?141

G-70Will my G-70 fit my vest, gimbal or sled?126

FI+ZCan I control iris and zoom wirelessly, not just focus?60

HU3Where can I get my HU3 repaired, refurbished or repainted?60

CineLiveHow do I pack and case my CineLive rig for transport?54

G-70XHow does the G-70X compare to Pro Titan, Xarm and other arms?46

Trinity 2Is Trinity 2 SUP 3.0 firmware safe to install or buggy?46

Ultra VestWhich vest should I choose for my body size, comfort and operator type?39

2010Monitors forum

Cinedeck monitor and recording device practical performance and limitations in field use

16 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.

What the thread found

The Cinedeck functions as a compact Windows PC with integrated monitor and custom software for recording video.
The Cinedeck's brightness rating does not match real-world daylight performance; it performs poorly as a daylight on-set monitor compared to dedicated field monitors.
The Cinedeck excels as a recording device and works particularly well for 3D stereoscopic work.
Software stability issues include frequent freezing requiring up to ten minutes to restore live video feed, and shutdowns taking several minutes through the custom interface.
Specific shutdown procedures are required; using Windows shutdown directly is significantly faster than exiting custom recording software first.
Battery management is critical; allowing the battery to fully deplete causes severe software malfunctions.
The device showed discrepancies between displayed recording settings and actual recorded output, requiring testing with post-production verification before deployment.
The unit requires substantial RAM upgrades for adequate performance speed.
The touchscreen interface lacks a lockout feature, creating accidental input risks during use.
3D mode operation can cause system instability requiring reboots.
Thermal management issues have occurred during extended operation.
Recording storage SSDs have experienced failures, though this has improved over time.
No 4-pin XLR power input requires alternative power solutions when mounted on stabilization rigs.
The device cannot change camera settings or frame rates during production without risking recording inaccuracies.
Early adopter experiences were limited by minimal documentation provided with the unit.

Depends on

Experience reports are from 2010, representing early production units.
Not all issues were fully documented; users did not exhaustively test all operational modes.
Only 4:2:2 color sampling was tested; higher bandwidth formats like 4:4:4 or Alexa raw output behavior remains untested.
Limited pre-production testing time available before deployment affected troubleshooting capability.
Different users report varying performance results; some found it unsuitable for monitoring while others found specific use cases valuable.
Daylight monitor performance remains poor; manufacturer indicated a daylight-optimized version was planned but not yet available.

Read the original thread Ask about this threadThe answer cites the archive