SteadiHub
2004General Discussion forum

Video format and file size considerations for posting demo reels online in 2004

22 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

What the thread found

  • Windows Media Video and QuickTime were the preferred formats for online demo reels, with Windows Media offering better size-to-quality ratio and QuickTime providing broader compatibility across platforms.
  • Multiple bitrate encoding in a single Windows Media file allowed serving the same video to different connection speeds from 56k to 1mbps.
  • QuickTime in MP4 format required at least version 6 for playback and resulted in approximately 3.5 megabytes per minute at reasonable frame sizes.
  • Sorenson 3 codec provided better visual quality than MPEG4 for QuickTime streaming despite being an older codec.
  • Breaking demo reels into clips of 30 seconds to 2 minutes with preview information helped viewers choose which segments to download and manage expectations about download time.
  • Windows Movie Maker was noted as producing surprisingly good compression results.
  • Mac users often could not view Windows Media Video files, making QuickTime necessary for cross-platform compatibility.

Depends on

  • The discussion occurred in 2004 when internet connection speeds were significantly slower than modern standards.
  • QuickTime MP4 compatibility was limited to version 6 and later.
  • Streaming video hosting was expensive at the time, limiting options for many creators.
  • No consensus was reached on optimal file sizes or download wait times.
  • The compression quality comparison between codecs was anecdotal rather than technical analysis.
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive