Comparison of MK-V Level prototype and Betz Wave: flight characteristics, weight savings, and low-mode operation.

2025From a Facebook group: The Steadicam Group

DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.

The MK-V Level performs as specified and feels identical in operation to the Betz Wave during use.
Level saves approximately 1.5 inches of camera height compared to Wave, and approximately 1.5 lbs, with greater savings when Wave is correctly balanced using spacer plates.
Level functions with standard camera plates; with side-adjustable plates, the camera does not drift when powered off, and the production model will include a locking mechanism.
The rotation nodal point on Level is approximately 3–3.25 inches, compared to approximately 4.5 inches on Wave.
Level requires no spacer plates to raise the camera and has minimal impact on sled balance.
Balancing procedure: balance the sled normally, then power on; drop time does not change, and one operator prefers 3–4 seconds after years with Volt.
Critical for both Level and Wave 1: position the center of gravity as close as possible to the nodal point of rotation; if it sits lower, the horizon will oscillate during leveling.
Low-mode operation works well; power off and on when inverting the rig, otherwise standard low-mode rebalancing applies.
Low-profile top stages with Level create particularly compact configurations.

Wave is multifunctional for use beyond Steadicam® (tripod, boat with long rails) and requires more than the approximately 5–6 degrees of correction that Level provides.
Level costs more than double the price of Wave according to manufacturer statement.
Drop-time preference varies by operator experience and rig setup.
Some operators consider Level as alternative to Volt because workflow changes minimally.