What the thread found

• The M-2 gimbal features an internal encoder ring for pan control, while the M-1 has the pan encoder positioned on the outside where it is vulnerable to damage.
• The M-2 gimbal can position closer to the top stage of a rig due to its internal encoder design, reducing the risk of damage during operation.
• Both gimbals share the same pan bearing and similar yoke designs overall.
• The M-2 gimbal offers adjustable arm post diameter through factory-installed sleeves, while the M-1 requires replacing the entire handle to change arm post sizes.
• The M-2 represents a refinement of the M-1 design with improved durability and easier adjustment rather than fundamental mechanical changes.

Depends on

• Information specific to use with the Volt camera
• Detailed performance comparisons under actual operating conditions were not discussed

Gear in this thread

Voltcatalog

Parts

Top Stage, Gimbal Bearing, Arm Post

Same gear or parts

1. 2026Rig setup for 180-degree immersive camera operation with Blackmagic URSA Cine Immersive: minimizing rig and monitor visibility in ultra-wide field of view.FacebookThe Steadicam Group
2. 2026Volt generations, and whether the system is necessary at allDisputedOperator practice
3. 2026Upgrading an older Steadicam® MK-V with 1.5-inch post to Volt configuration or switching to the new Steadicam® Elite (1.25-inch post, 14 kg).FacebookThe Steadicam Group
4. 2026Recommended upgrade priorities for a GPI Pro steadicam rigSteadi-Newbies