2010Brackets/Widgets forum
Availability and practicality of low-mode mounting options for the ARRI 435 camera
16 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- The 100% video tap can be used as an alternative to a dedicated low-mode bracket for operating the ARRI 435 in low-mode positions.
- Switching between the eyepiece and a 100% video tap requires removing and reinstalling multiple screws, a task that takes a few minutes.
- Extended experience with the ARRI 435 in aerial filming shows that the 100% video tap does not typically cause light leaks when properly installed using the same mounting holes as the eyepiece.
- A dedicated low-mode bracket can tilt, which is a capability the standard 100% video tap does not offer.
- The 100% video tap setup may result in lighter total camera weight compared to configurations using a dedicated low-mode bracket with associated equipment.
- Rental facilities in the northeastern United States, such as those in New Jersey, may stock the ARRI low-mode bracket.
Depends on
- The knowledge is based on experience from the 2000s with film-based camera systems.
- Concerns were raised about potential film exposure risks with certain mounts, but this was not confirmed by experienced operators.
- The practical weight difference between mounting approaches was not quantified.
- No direct experience was shared regarding the Jerry Hill low-mode bracket specifically.
Parts
Same gear or parts
- 2026Vest drops: what lowering the arm socket actually buys, and what it costs at the topOperator practice
- 2026Lemo connectors on the ARRI Artemis sled: pinout, polarity verification, and powering low-mode monitors and Volt battery.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2026Mounting the TIFFEN Volt brain: rigidity comparison between ARRI rod mounts and CamJam mounts to minimize vibrationsDisputedSteadiHub
- 2026Low mode and flipping the image: what to check on the camera before the dayOperator practice