2007Video Assist and Video Accessories forum
Wireless video transmitters for on-set monitoring and their reliability issues
19 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- Cheap wireless video transmitters are unreliable due to interference from surrounding equipment and environments
- A transmitter with at least four switchable channels provides better flexibility than models requiring screwdriver adjustment of internal potentiometers to change channels
- Wireless video signals can drop in and out during shots, making them unsuitable as the sole monitoring solution on professional productions
- Recording simultaneously with an onboard camera serves as a backup when wireless video transmission becomes unstable or fails
- Small form factor video recording devices under three hundred dollars can capture clean footage as insurance against wireless transmission failure
Depends on
- Experience limited to specific geographic locations and production setups
- Desert environment performance of these transmitters remains untested in the available discussion
- Specific transmitter models and their performance characteristics are not detailed beyond general reliability concerns
- The discussion reflects early 2000s technology and pricing
Gear in this thread
Same gear or parts
- 2025History of wireless focus and lens control systems for Steadicam®: from cable-based Cinema Products and Seitz to Preston digital, and European solutions by Chrosziel, cmotion, and ARRI.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2018Identifying polarity of 2-pin Lemo power cables for BFD and Teradek unitsFollow Focus
- 2018Compatibility between analog Bartech follow focus handsets and digital motor systemsFollow Focus
- 2016Payment collection challenges in equipment rental and cable supply servicesLegal / Business Practices