2011Monitors forum
Real-world performance of Cinetronic LCD monitor compared to predecessor models
15 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
What the thread found
- The Cinetronic monitor maintains visibility in hazy conditions and shows clear image contours even when reflecting direct sunlight.
- Daylight brightness is sufficient for outdoor use in harsh lighting conditions including Miami summer full sun.
- Screen reflectivity is manageable and only becomes distracting when dust or smudges accumulate on the surface.
- Viewing angles extend from approximately 45 to 180 degrees vertically without significant image degradation, supporting inverted low-mode operation.
- The monitor successfully functions in extreme environments such as 85,000 kilometers of rough travel without failure.
- Horizontal viewing angles provide excellent performance across wide angles of approach.
- The sealed water-resistant design offers better water protection than competitor models with perforated cases.
- Current generation housing is bulky and heavier than desired, though subsequent versions are expected to be more compact and lighter.
- Menu navigation includes intuitive options for image rotation and zoom level indicators, but lacks a brightness percentage display for LED backlight adjustment.
- The monitor accepts composite analog video via LEMO power connector without requiring cable modifications from previous setups.
- Weight and balance characteristics are comparable to or slightly heavier than predecessor green-screen monitors.
- Lack of frame lines is not problematic when cameras have built-in frame line generators or ground glass.
- Lead time for purchase is approximately several weeks due to hand-built, custom manufacturing.
- Competitor Boland monitor offers superior viewing angles and reflectivity compared to its previous generation, with documented salt water submersion durability.
Depends on
- Performance observations are from early 2011, when generation 1 housing was current; generation 2 housing with improved features was announced as forthcoming.
- Brightness assessment relies on photographic documentation which does not fully capture subjective daylight visibility.
- Viewing angle specifications are approximate estimates rather than manufacturer specifications.
- Direct comparison with Boland monitor is based on visual assessment rather than controlled testing.
- Several users preferred or owned alternative monitors including Transvideo and Boland models, indicating preference variation in the market.
- Submersion durability testing is anecdotal for one competitor product rather than controlled study.
- Menu structure assessment notes that future LCD controller redesign would alter evaluation.
- Some users continued using older TB-6 models for specific shooting scenarios, suggesting niche applications where newer monitor did not fully replace predecessor.
Parts
Same gear or parts
- 2026Vest drops: what lowering the arm socket actually buys, and what it costs at the topOperator practice
- 2026Lemo connectors on the ARRI Artemis sled: pinout, polarity verification, and powering low-mode monitors and Volt battery.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2026Mounting the TIFFEN Volt brain: rigidity comparison between ARRI rod mounts and CamJam mounts to minimize vibrationsDisputedSteadiHub
- 2026Low mode and flipping the image: what to check on the camera before the dayOperator practice