2009Operating forum
Challenges and solutions for shooting a 90-minute continuous steadicam take
17 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.
What the thread found
- Operator fatigue is a primary concern for extended takes, requiring extensive rehearsals broken into sections and preparation with actors to memorize cues and movements.
- Communication cues can be provided through a combination of crib sheets attached to the operator's vest and spotting by the cinematographer during the actual take.
- Wireless video links or handheld monitors allow the director and key crew to follow the shot when a traditional video village is impractical due to camera movement through multiple locations.
- Reducing equipment weight is critical; stripping the camera to bare essentials and using lightweight steadicam rigs with back-mounted harnesses decreases operator strain.
- Power management for extended takes requires careful calculation; using multiple battery systems may not provide sufficient runtime for a camera and rig drawing 8-9 amps continuously for 90 minutes.
- Actor rehearsal is essential since errors late in a long take require starting over; even experienced performers may struggle with remembering lines or cues far into the shot.
- Pre-visualization with handheld or lightweight camera rigs during rehearsal helps establish precise movement and timing without exhausting the steadicam operator before the final take.
- Contingency planning for technical failures is necessary, such as unexpected power loss or location access issues that might occur mid-take.
- Maintaining viewer engagement over very long shots is challenging; some believe shots longer than 4-5 minutes risk losing audience interest regardless of technical achievement.
Depends on
- Experience described is from productions with different camera systems (HDV, lighter rigs) rather than specifically with RED; power calculations for RED are theoretical rather than tested.
- One practitioner's 111-minute single take claim lacks independent verification.
- Discussion touches on Russian Ark as a reference but notes subjective viewing experience rather than objective data on audience engagement.
- Power calculations assume consistent amp draw, but actual consumption may vary based on operational demands and motor use.
- The technical feasibility of sustaining a RED camera system for 90 minutes at full capacity remains questioned but unresolved in the thread.
Gear in this thread
Same gear or parts
- 2026Power loss on Trinity 2 / Artemis 2 with large cameras (A35, Venice): causes and battery solutions.DisputedFacebookArri Artemis Trinity
- 2025Custom servo zoom controller for Tilta Nucleus system using Bebob Zoe housing and 7-pin LEMO connectorFacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2024Mounting Sony Venice 2 on ARRI Trinity with SAM-0 plate: build configuration and balancing strategies.FacebookArri Artemis Trinity
- 2023Mounting Preston MDR4 focus motor and Light Ranger iris control on an ALEXA 35 on the ARRI TrinityFacebookArri Artemis Trinity