SteadiHub
2004Gimbal forum

Comparison of gimbal options including mk-v v2, 3a, and XCS Ultimate models

22 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

What the thread found

  • The mk-v v2 gimbal represents a significant upgrade from the 3a model, offering noticeably reduced friction and smoother operation.
  • The mk-v v2 features a larger yoke that provides improved monitor visibility compared to the 3a, though it requires an adjustment period.
  • The mk-v v2 has solid engineering with no play in its construction, but the larger size may feel unfamiliar initially.
  • The mk-v v2 yoke can be replaced with longer alternatives for increased height or modified with new electronics.
  • The XCS gimbal by Greg Bubb offers excellent performance and is field-serviceable, allowing complete disassembly and cleaning in under one minute without losing small parts.
  • The XCS gimbal accommodates various post diameters up to 2 inches without requiring new gimbal purchases when changing post sizes.
  • The XCS gimbal maintains performance even when exposed to extreme dust conditions and can be restored to working order with carburetor cleaner and simple disassembly.
  • The XCS gimbal features a symmetrical top cap design and an ergo handle that improves low-mode comfort.
  • Gimbal lubrication choice affects performance, with ultra-light oils like Arri High Speed Oil providing optimal friction characteristics, while heavier lubricants can reduce performance or be used if slightly increased friction is desired.
  • The XCS gimbal was designed to perform identically in low mode and high mode and supports rig inversion during shots.

Depends on

  • One user mentioned unspecified problems with the mk-v v2 version but provided no details about the issues.
  • The mk-v v2 requires a proper spacer sized to the user's post, necessitating communication with the manufacturer about specifications.
  • The mk-v v2 requires more delicate handling for whip pans compared to other models.
  • Information about gimbal lubrication impact on friction characteristics remained incomplete, with different users reporting preference for different weights.
  • The thread includes anecdotal experiences rather than comprehensive performance comparisons.
  • One recommendation for the XCS gimbal was made by a satisfied user, not an independent review.

Parts

Low Mode

Same gear or parts

  1. 2026Low-mode monitor selection for Volt Brain rig: latency performance of Transvideo Starlite versus current alternatives.DisputedFacebookThe Steadicam Group
  2. 2026Rig setup for 180-degree immersive camera operation with Blackmagic URSA Cine Immersive: minimizing rig and monitor visibility in ultra-wide field of view.FacebookThe Steadicam Group
  3. 2026Low mode and flipping the image: what to check on the camera before the dayOperator practice
  4. 2026Lemo connectors on the ARRI Artemis sled: pinout, polarity verification, and powering low-mode monitors and Volt battery.FacebookSteadicam operators group
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive