SteadiHub
2011Operating forum

Balancing and tuning a Sony EX3 camera on a Steadicam rig for stable operation

15 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

Note (as of October 2026)Curt O. Schaller, the developer of Artemis and Trinity, has no longer been with ARRI since the end of 2025. To our knowledge, ARRI currently has no dedicated team and no official contact persons for its stabilizer systems. In our view, the future of this line is uncertain. If you are buying new, get written confirmation from ARRI beforehand on how long service and spare parts are guaranteed. Have used rigs checked by the manufacturer before you buy.
DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.

What the thread found

  • The Sony EX3 is a lightweight camera that tends to feel twitchy on Steadicam rigs compared to heavier cinema cameras, requiring adjustment of technique and rig settings.
  • Adding weight through brass plates and counterbalance donuts between the top stage and camera can help stabilize a lighter rig setup.
  • Drop time settings for lightweight camera rigs should be faster than standard settings, typically in the 2 to 2.5 second range rather than the 3 to 6 seconds used for heavier cameras.
  • Faster drop times on lightweight setups provide better hand feedback and reduce the operator's tendency to make reactive corrections that destabilize the shot.
  • Drop time optimization should be adjusted based on the shot requirements, with faster times for minimal tilting and slower times only when extensive tilting is unavoidable.
  • Extending the Steadicam base increases pan inertia, which can reduce the twitchy feeling when operating lighter cameras.
  • The Sony EX3 has a crop factor of 1.38 on the sensor, affecting effective focal lengths of mounted lenses.

Depends on

  • The lightweight camera handling advice comes from theater performance shoots with frequent close-up tilting, which may differ from other shooting scenarios.
  • One operator's experience suggested the camera has poor image quality and problematic mounting hardware, but this represents a personal opinion rather than universal technical limitation.
  • Specific rig configuration details and weight specifications varied across different operator setups, so results may depend on individual rig design.
  • The discussion does not provide scientific measurement of the twitchiness problem or quantitative comparison data.

Gear in this thread

Artemiscatalog, Master Seriescatalog

Parts

Top Stage

Same gear or parts

  1. 2026Why a 150 Wh battery at the sled powers the camera for only ~20 minutes versus two to three times longer when mounted on-body, and how to extend runtime.DisputedFacebookThe Steadicam Group
  2. 2026Choosing between upgrading an older ProVid-2 kit or investing in a professional rig: workshop-first versus equipment-first approach for beginners.DisputedFacebookSteadicam operators group
  3. 2026Lemo connectors on the ARRI Artemis sled: pinout, polarity verification, and powering low-mode monitors and Volt battery.FacebookSteadicam operators group
  4. 2026Voltage display discrepancies between camera and RCP on ARRI Artemis Trinity 2: 24 V rail showing 23.4 V at RCP versus 28 V at camera.DisputedFacebookArri Artemis Trinity
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive