2004Monitors forum
FBX electronic level and frameline generator for cinema camera monitors
22 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
Note (as of October 2026)Curt O. Schaller, the developer of Artemis and Trinity, has no longer been with ARRI since the end of 2025. To our knowledge, ARRI currently has no dedicated team and no official contact persons for its stabilizer systems. In our view, the future of this line is uncertain. If you are buying new, get written confirmation from ARRI beforehand on how long service and spare parts are guaranteed. Have used rigs checked by the manufacturer before you buy.
What the thread found
- The FBX combines an electronic bubble level and frameline generator in a compact device smaller than competing products at approximately half the price.
- The FBX offers multiple customization options including four different crosshair sizes, variable bubble sensitivity, damping control, and directional/axis adjustment.
- Frameline mask or border shading on the FBX is available at two fixed levels (50% and 100%) rather than variable density.
- Operators prefer positioning electronic bubble level displays at the top of the screen rather than in the frame to minimize eye travel while checking composition and horizon level.
- The FBX initial design restricted bubble placement to below the crosshair only, which manufacturers later modified to allow placement at either top or bottom of screen based on operator feedback.
- An electronic level display with selectable density masking behind only the bubble indicator would improve visibility when the bubble appears over busy or bright screen areas.
- The device uses standard connectors and cables rather than captive cables, and ships with configuration flexibility for different sled designs.
- Service turnaround for FBX orders was less than one week at the time of this discussion.
Depends on
- Discussion is from 2004 and product specifications may have changed significantly since then.
- Initial design limitations on bubble and border placement were acknowledged constraints rather than resolved issues.
- Field reliability testing under harsh conditions was mentioned as pending at the time of writing.
- Pricing and availability information reflects 2004 market conditions.
- Some claims about superior design features of competing products (XCS level) remain unverified in this thread.
Gear in this thread
Parts
Same gear or parts
- 2026Upgrading an M1 Volt gimbal from 1.5-inch to 1.75-inch center rod: insert replacement procedure and encoder ring considerations.DisputedFacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2026Choosing between upgrading an older ProVid-2 kit or investing in a professional rig: workshop-first versus equipment-first approach for beginners.DisputedFacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2026Entry-level stabilizer strategy on a 15,000 USD budget: Rever EVO versus used Artemis 2 or M2 plus Volt, in a market with limited secondhand availability.DisputedFacebookThe Steadicam Group
- 2026Evaluating whether to repair an older ProVid 2 system or invest in a newer rig for entry-level steadicam workSteadi-Newbies