2019Follow Focus forum
Comparison of Hedén motors versus Preston motors for follow focus systems
What the thread found
- Hedén motors offer advantages in size, weight, and ease of setup compared to Preston motors, with quick mounting and swappable gear configurations requiring no tools.
- Hedén motor packages include multiple gear sizes and collets for different lens mounting standards, making them versatile for various setups.
- Hedén motors operate quietly and deliver good torque-to-size ratio suitable for Preston follow focus systems.
- Preston motors may have a marginal advantage in maximum torque output, though this is rarely a limiting factor in practice.
- Hedén motors feature straightforward mechanical design that allows rapid reconfiguration, such as flipping mounting orientation in seconds.
Depends on
- Discussion reflects experience from around 2019 and market conditions may have changed.
- One participant no longer uses Hedén equipment, limiting current operational feedback.
- Claim about Preston's market dominance being due to institutional status rather than technical superiority is subjective.
- No detailed comparison of specific performance metrics like actual torque values or failure rates.
- Mounting compatibility with certain configurations like dogbone adapters may require creative solutions.
Parts
Same gear or parts
- 2026Pulling focus and zoom yourself while operating, especially on live showsOperator practice
- 2026Swapping an ARRI ALEXA 35 between tripod/studio and Steadicam® mounting: baseplate choice and fastest workflow.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2025LC-1 (Lens Control-1) follow focus system: wired architecture, motors, and early operational experience (1990s).FacebookThe Steadicam Group
- 2024Modifications to a Steadicam Scout rig for expanded power distribution and connectivityGeneral Discussion