SteadiHub
2009Gimbal forum

Advantages and disadvantages of 2-inch gimbal posts compared to smaller diameters

17 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.

What the thread found

  • Increasing post diameter from 1.5 inches to 2 inches raises stiffness by a factor of approximately eleven times, following the fourth-power relationship between diameter and stiffness in tubular structures.
  • Larger gimbal diameters can accommodate larger bearings, which typically provide smoother operation and better weight distribution with heavier camera rigs.
  • A 2-inch gimbal provides greater leverage when holding the rig, making small hand movements have larger unintended effects on lighter rigs with low inertia.
  • Smaller and lighter rigs benefit from smaller gimbal diameters to avoid excessive responsiveness to operator input, while heavier rigs with more spread-out weight benefit from larger diameters.
  • Post diameter is only one factor affecting overall rig stiffness and rigidity; bearing quality, gimbal design, wall thickness, and material selection significantly influence performance.
  • Hand size and personal preference play major roles in gimbal selection, with some operators preferring the control feel of larger gimbals despite smaller hand sizes after adaptation.
  • Extended post lengths and whip pans stress the structural integrity more noticeably, where larger diameter posts show their stiffness advantages over smaller ones.

Depends on

  • The original poster noted that physics-based calculations may not perfectly match real-world performance with different materials like carbon fiber, which requires empirical testing.
  • Some participants noted that bearing quality and gimbal design quality can compensate for post diameter differences.
  • The discussion reflects experience with specific gimbal models and designs from a particular time period (2009) when some manufacturing approaches have since evolved.
  • Ergonomic preferences and adaptation period vary significantly between individual operators and cannot be universally predicted.
  • Participants disagreed about whether post diameter alone determines practical performance differences in real shooting conditions.

Parts

Gimbal Bearing

Same gear or parts

  1. 2026Lubricating a Steadicam gimbal bearing after cleaning, and the Tri-Flow supply problemOperator practice
  2. 2026The pan bearing in the gimbal: what a Kaydon bearing is, what fails, and what a change of supplier would and would not meanOperator practice
  3. 2026Adjusting play in a Steadicam® Master Series gimbal yoke and balancing it for smooth 180-degree pan without tipping.DisputedFacebookSteadicam operators group
  4. 2026Removing a PRO gimbal from a VZ grip for conversion to a Volt-modified gimbal.DisputedFacebookSteadicam operators group
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive