What the thread found

• Downconverter rental fees have become difficult to charge as HD shooting became standard practice, whereas they were chargeable when film production was common.
• Clients increasingly expect operators to have their own solution for handling HD signals on their rigs, whether through an HD monitor or downconverter, rather than paying extra rental fees.
• High-end specialized wireless HD systems with significant initial costs can still command additional rental fees when their performance and capabilities are clearly explained to production management.
• Clients may refuse to pay additional fees for HD transmission equipment, arguing that an alternative free solution exists.
• Wireless HD monitoring systems that cost substantially more than basic downconverters are more defensible as separate rental line items than low-cost signal conversion tools.

Depends on

• The discussion occurred in 2011 during a transition period when HD production was becoming standard but not yet universal.
• Pricing and market expectations may differ between regions and production types.
• The viability of charging appears to depend heavily on the cost and perceived value of the equipment rather than its function.

Gear in this thread

Moduluscatalog

Same gear or parts

1. 2022Power connector pinout for Master Greenscreen CRT monitor with 6-pin Hirose connectorMonitors
2. 2017Wireless teleprompter setups for steadicam operationGeneral Discussion
3. 2016Performance and reliability characteristics of Tiltamax wireless video transmitters compared to competing brandsDisputedVideo Assist and Video Accessories
4. 2014Teradek Bolt transmitter running hot during operationVideo Assist and Video Accessories