SteadiHub
2010Follow Focus forum

Wireless follow focus systems and emerging technologies in focus pulling

16 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.

DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.

What the thread found

  • Preston and Scorpio systems have operated on the 2.4 GHz frequency for over a decade, which is the same frequency used by WiFi technology.
  • The Arri CLM-2 motor has weaker performance and built-in cables with non-standard pinouts, limiting compatibility and requiring entire motor replacement for spares.
  • The Arri CLM-3 motor offers improved strength and compatibility compared to the CLM-2, at a higher cost.
  • Lower-cost digital alternatives to Preston and Scorpio systems were emerging, including the BFD with digital receiver and the HoFoPro, compatible with existing digital motors.
  • Touch screen interfaces for focus pulling with face recognition and auto-assist features were being proposed to make focus pulling more accessible to less experienced operators, though reliable autofocus remains challenging across professional camera systems.
  • Manual focus knobs provide a more natural and efficient workflow for trained focus pullers who calculate distances numerically.
  • Touch screen-based focus systems were already being demonstrated by equipment manufacturers at the time of discussion, though they required large sensor boxes mounted above the lens.
  • Focus pulling with monitors had become more accepted on high-end productions as an alternative to traditional distance-based methods.

Depends on

  • Discussion occurred in 2010, making technology assessments dated.
  • The Arri system assessment was based on an older CLM-2 motor model; newer CLM-3 motors addressed some complaints.
  • Touch screen technology predictions were largely speculative and untested for professional work at the time.
  • The Clairmont touch screen system was described as bulky and hard-wired, with unclear compatibility information.
  • Autofocus performance in professional cameras was still unreliable, creating skepticism about automated focus solutions.
  • Debate remained unresolved about whether automated focus would ever match skilled manual focus pulling.

Gear in this thread

HU3, BFD

Parts

Follow Focus

Same gear or parts

  1. 2026Pulling focus and zoom yourself while operating, especially on live showsOperator practice
  2. 2026Swapping an ARRI ALEXA 35 between tripod/studio and Steadicam® mounting: baseplate choice and fastest workflow.FacebookSteadicam operators group
  3. 2025History of wireless focus and lens control systems for Steadicam®: from cable-based Cinema Products and Seitz to Preston digital, and European solutions by Chrosziel, cmotion, and ARRI.FacebookSteadicam operators group
  4. 2025LC-1 (Lens Control-1) follow focus system: wired architecture, motors, and early operational experience (1990s).FacebookThe Steadicam Group
Read the original threadAsk about this threadThe answer cites the archive