2016Follow Focus forum
Comparison of wireless follow focus systems: Bartech versus DJI Focus
What the thread found
- Bartech follow focus systems have demonstrated long-term durability, with units from 1997 still functioning reliably decades later.
- Bartech offers rapid international customer service, including spare parts delivery within 48 hours to remote locations.
- DJI Focus lacks a remote start/stop feature for camera control via the handset.
- Bartech systems are more widely known among focus pullers and first assistant cameras, making them easier to operate on set without additional training.
- Cinegears offers follow focus systems with high-torque motors manufactured in Germany and has provided reliable performance over extended use.
Depends on
- The comparison is based primarily on reputation and anecdotal experience rather than direct side-by-side testing.
- DJI Focus was new at the time of discussion (2016) and long-term durability data was unavailable.
- Specific motor performance characteristics such as speed, accuracy, and delay were mentioned as comparison points but not detailed in the thread.
- One motor type in Bartech was mentioned as problematic but not clearly identified.
- Preston systems were noted as standard in some markets but not thoroughly compared.
- User familiarity varies by region and market, affecting operational efficiency.
Gear in this thread
Parts
Same gear or parts
- 2026Pulling focus and zoom yourself while operating, especially on live showsOperator practice
- 2026Swapping an ARRI ALEXA 35 between tripod/studio and Steadicam® mounting: baseplate choice and fastest workflow.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2025History of wireless focus and lens control systems for Steadicam®: from cable-based Cinema Products and Seitz to Preston digital, and European solutions by Chrosziel, cmotion, and ARRI.FacebookSteadicam operators group
- 2025LC-1 (Lens Control-1) follow focus system: wired architecture, motors, and early operational experience (1990s).FacebookThe Steadicam Group