2009Steadi-Newbies forum
Comparison of entry-level and professional body-mounted stabilizers, focusing on balancing difficulty and operational performance
17 years old. Gear and prices may have changed since.
Note (as of October 2026)Curt O. Schaller, the developer of Artemis and Trinity, has no longer been with ARRI since the end of 2025. To our knowledge, ARRI currently has no dedicated team and no official contact persons for its stabilizer systems. In our view, the future of this line is uncertain. If you are buying new, get written confirmation from ARRI beforehand on how long service and spare parts are guaranteed. Have used rigs checked by the manufacturer before you buy.
DisputedParticipants disagreed and reached no conclusion. Read the findings as positions, not as an answer.
What the thread found
- The Glidecam Smooth Shooter with 4000 Pro post requires extremely tedious balancing adjustments with fine screws that are difficult to move incrementally, and loses stability easily when bumped or exposed to wind.
- Professional stabilizers like the Steadicam Flyer and Pilot have superior arm designs using iso-elastic mechanisms that require minimal operator force throughout their range of motion, compared to springy 3rd party arms that become harder to control at the extremes.
- The critical performance elements of any stabilizer are the arm and gimbal, which are the only moving parts responsible for isolation and image quality.
- Glidecam gimbal designs often suffer from non-linear alignment of the three axes around the central point, causing balance shifts during panning movements.
- Entry-level stabilizers require significantly more operator skill and practice to achieve acceptable results compared to professional-grade equipment.
- The Sachtler Artemis HD can be balanced and ready to operate in minutes compared to repeated time-consuming rebalancing cycles on the Smooth Shooter.
- Steadicam brand products, particularly the Flyer arm, provide a noticeable operational advantage in comfort and isolation quality over equivalent 3rd party designs.
Depends on
- The initial criticism is based primarily on the author's experience with one specific older model and may reflect operator skill level as much as equipment limitations.
- Direct comparison testing was limited to brief demonstrations at dealers rather than extended production use.
- Some claims about the Smooth Shooter's non-functionality were not objectively verified by other experienced operators in the thread.
- The author's experience with the Flyer was anticipated rather than hands-on.
- Sample video clips provided were not detailed enough to conclusively demonstrate the equipment performance issues claimed.
Gear in this thread
Same gear or parts
- 2026Powering camera, monitor, and accessories simultaneously on ARRI Artemis with BMS battery bricks and matching battery plates.SteadiHub
- 2026Why a 150 Wh battery at the sled powers the camera for only ~20 minutes versus two to three times longer when mounted on-body, and how to extend runtime.DisputedFacebookThe Steadicam Group
- 2026MK-V Level horizon stabilizer: specifications, plate compatibility, price, and comparison to Wave.DisputedFacebookThe Steadicam Group
- 2026Choosing between upgrading an older ProVid-2 kit or investing in a professional rig: workshop-first versus equipment-first approach for beginners.DisputedFacebookSteadicam operators group